Evolution and the Single-Pair Bottleneck

Authors
  • A. C. Skow

    Author

Abstract

The flood narrative in Genesis records that most terrestrial animals boarded the ark as single breeding pairs, with a smaller set of clean animals boarding in sevens. Read literally, this places nearly every living terrestrial lineage through a founding event of one diploid pair roughly 4,500 years ago, followed by dispersal from a single region, the mountains of Ararat in the Middle East, in what is now Turkey. This paper evaluates that scenario against two well established bodies of population genetics: the genetics of small and inbred populations, and the theory of founder effects during range expansion. An effective size of about two produces severe and predictable consequences, rising inbreeding, loss of genetic variation, and a risk of mutational meltdown. A single geographic origin further predicts a radial decline of genetic diversity away from the point of release and a nested, serial founder structure centered on the mountains of Ararat. The observed distribution of terrestrial diversity does not show this pattern; it shows deep, geographically structured radiations and coalescence times that greatly exceed a few thousand years. I close by stating two falsifiable challenges that a literal ark model must meet: to demonstrate the founder effect and inbreeding signatures of a recent single pair bottleneck, and to demonstrate the expected radiation outward from the region where the ark is said to have come to rest.

Author Biography
  1. A. C. Skow

    Andrew Skow is an independent researcher specializing in molecular nanotechnology, genetics, and cryopreservation. His research interests center on the intersection of molecular science and emerging biomedical technologies, particularly approaches that may improve the preservation, protection, and restoration of complex biological systems.

    Skow’s work explores how advances in nanotechnology and molecular engineering can be applied to challenges in genetics, tissue preservation, organ banking, and long term biological storage. His research is particularly focused on the potential for nanoscale technologies to overcome limitations in conventional cryopreservation and contribute to the development of more effective methods for preserving viable cells, tissues, and organs.

References

Avise, J. C. (2000). Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Charlesworth, D., & Charlesworth, B. (1987). Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 237–268.

Frankham, R. (1996). Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conservation Biology, 10(6), 1500–1508.

Hedrick, P. W., & Kalinowski, S. T. (2000). Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 139–162.

Hewitt, G. M. (2000). The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature, 405, 907–913.

Keller, L. F., & Waller, D. M. (2002). Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17(5), 230–241.

Lynch, M., Conery, J., & Bürger, R. (1995). Mutational meltdowns in sexual populations. Evolution, 49(6), 1067–1080.

Spielman, D., Brook, B. W., & Frankham, R. (2004). Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(42), 15261–15264.

Cover Image
Published
2026-07-12
Section
Articles
Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)