The Freeze We Don’t Plan For

Crisis behavior, decision-making under threat, and the case for combat training as a standard in the safety professions

Authors
  • T. Nakamura

    Author

Abstract

Emergency preparedness is commonly built around the assumption that individuals will recognize danger, recall established procedures, and act rationally under pressure. Research in crisis psychology, however, suggests that acute threat frequently produces the opposite response: freezing, cognitive paralysis, narrowed perception, impaired working memory, degraded decision-making, and fear-driven overreaction. This paper examines the psychophysiology of acute threat and argues that the principal behavioral challenge in emergencies is often not mass panic, but the inability of otherwise capable individuals to function effectively when arousal overwhelms deliberate reasoning. Drawing on research in stress physiology, recognition-primed decision-making, stress inoculation, police performance, martial-arts training, and use-of-force behavior, the paper evaluates whether repeated exposure to realistic, controlled adversity can preserve performance under extreme stress. Particular attention is given to combat sports and grappling-based training as methods of repeatedly exposing participants to fear, physical pressure, loss of control, and adverse positions while requiring continued goal-directed behavior. Evidence from experimental police studies and field observations suggests that such training may improve composure, situational awareness, defensive performance, and force decisions under anxiety. Building on these findings, this paper proposes the Controlled Adversity Hypothesis: that the protective effect of combat training is driven primarily not by strength, fitness, or aggression, but by cumulative exposure to controlled experiences of losing while remaining functional. The hypothesis generates falsifiable predictions involving dose-response relationships, differences between combat disciplines, physiological mediation, and sustained training frequency. The paper concludes that continuous, control-based, adversity-rich training deserves serious investigation as a component of preparation for professionals responsible for protecting others during critical incidents, while emphasizing that the proposed mechanism remains experimentally unconfirmed.

Author Biography
  1. T. Nakamura

    Dr. Tim Nakam is a distinguished public safety, emergency management, and behavioral science professional whose career brings together an uncommon combination of expertise in security, emergency preparedness, emergency medical care, clinical psychology, and forensic psychology.

    Dr.  Nakam has a background strengthened by an extensive multidisciplinary education. He earned a Bachelor of Science in Emergency Medical Care from Loma Linda University, pursued graduate studies through Pepperdine University's Graduate School of Education and Psychology, earned a Master of Arts in Forensic Psychology from Argosy University, and completed a Doctor of Psychology (Psy.D.) in Clinical Psychology at Ryokan College.

    His background in psychology provides a dimension to public safety that extends beyond traditional security. His professional experience encompasses clinical assessment, crisis intervention, behavioral health, forensic psychology, and work with individuals experiencing psychological or emotional distress. This combination allows him to approach safety from both the operational and human perspectives, recognizing that effective crisis management depends not only upon procedures and preparedness, but also upon understanding human behavior under extraordinary circumstances.

    Dr. Nakam has also been involved in Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) initiatives, evacuation and disaster exercises, emergency-response education, active-threat preparedness, and ALICE training, contributing to the development of safer and better-prepared campus communities. His work has included collaboration with administrators, educators, public-safety personnel, emergency responders, students, and community partners.

    His career reflects a rare intersection of medicine, psychology, emergency management, and public safety leadership. Whether developing emergency plans, coordinating institutional preparedness, addressing behavioral crises, or strengthening campus security, Dr. Nakam has devoted his professional life to one overarching mission: protecting people, preparing communities, and bringing calm, informed leadership to moments when it matters most.

References

Andersen, J. P., Di Nota, P. M., Beston, B., Boychuk, E. C., Gustafsberg, H., Poplawski, S., & Arpaia, J. (2018). Reducing lethal force errors by modulating police physiology. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(10), 867–874. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001401

Andersen, J. P., & Gustafsberg, H. (2016). A training method to improve police use of force decision making: A randomized controlled trial. SAGE Open, 6(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016638708

Arnsten, A. F. T. (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2648

Artwohl, A., & Christensen, L. W. (1997). Deadly force encounters: What cops need to know to mentally and physically prepare for and survive a gunfight. Paladin Press.

Bracha, H. S. (2004). Freeze, flight, fight, fright, faint: Adaptationist perspectives on the acute stress response spectrum. CNS Spectrums, 9(9), 679–685. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852900001954

Cannon, W. B. (1915). Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear and rage. D. Appleton and Company. Clarke, L. (2002). Panic: Myth or reality? Contexts, 1(3), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1525/ctx.2002.1.3.21

Donner, C. M., & Maskály, J. (2025). Examining the effect of warrior and guardian mindsets on attitudes toward use of force: An analysis of US police recruits. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 19, paaf001. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paaf001

Driskell, J. E., & Johnston, J. H. (1998). Stress exposure training. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 191–217). American Psychological Association.

Drury, J., Cocking, C., & Reicher, S. (2009). Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X357893

Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543

Grossman, D., & Christensen, L. W. (2008). On combat: The psychology and physiology of deadly conflict in war and in peace (3rd ed.). Warrior Science Publications.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Klein, G. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. MIT Press.

Kuligowski, E. D. (2009). The process of human behavior in fires (NIST Technical Note 1632). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://www.nist.gov/publications/process-human-behavior-fires

Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Leach, J. (2004). Why people “freeze” in an emergency: Temporal and cognitive constraints on survival responses. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 75(6), 539–542.

Leach, J. (2005). Cognitive paralysis in an emergency: The role of the supervisory attentional system. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 76(2), 134–136.

Marietta Police Department. (2021, February 8). BJJ training data documents reduction in injuries. City of Marietta. https://www.mariettaga.gov/CivicAlerts.asp?AID=3116

Mawson, A. R. (2005). Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster. Psychiatry, 68(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2005.68.2.95

Meichenbaum, D. (1985). Stress inoculation training. Pergamon Press.

Nieuwenhuys, A., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2012). Shoot or don’t shoot? Why police officers are more inclined to shoot when they are anxious. Emotion, 12(4), 827–833. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025699

Oudejans, R. R. D. (2008). Reality-based practice under pressure improves handgun shooting performance of police officers. Ergonomics, 51(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701577435

Quarantelli, E. L. (1954). The nature and conditions of panic. American Journal of Sociology, 60(3), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1086/221536

Renden, P. G., Landman, A., Geerts, S. F., Jansen, S. E. M., Faber, G. S., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2014). Effects of anxiety on the execution of police arrest and self-defense skills. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 27(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2013.810213

Renden, P. G., Landman, A., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2015). Police arrest and self-defence skills: Performance under anxiety of officers with and without additional experience in martial arts. Ergonomics, 58(9), 1496–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1013578

Renden, P. G., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2017). Effects of reflex-based self-defence training on police performance in simulated high-pressure arrest situations. Ergonomics, 60(5), 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1205222

Roelofs, K. (2017). Freeze for action: Neurobiological mechanisms in animal and human freezing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1718), Article 20160206. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0206

Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. McGraw-Hill.

Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18(5), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503

Cover Image
Published
2026-08-18
Section
Articles
Categories
License

Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s) retain copyright and articles are published under CC BY 4.0.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.