A Thomistic–Aristotelian Model of the Latin Trinity as an Apologetic Resource for Evangelical Theology

Authors
  • Tomas Samuel Petersson

    Quest Academy

    Author

Abstract

This article develops a Thomistic–Aristotelian model of the Latin doctrine of the Trinity that may serve evangelical theology in its engagement with philosophical atheism and analytic philosophy of religion. Drawing on Thomas Aquinas’s account of divine simplicity, his Aristotelian metaphysics of act and potency, and his doctrines of intelligible species, the verbum mentale, and the psychological analogy of intellect–word–love, I construct a conditional, “school‑style” argument: if classical theism in a Thomistic form is granted—namely, that there exists a simple, purely actual, intelligent, and volitional first cause—then a Latin‑style Trinitarian model with internal processions of Word and Love and three subsistent relations of origin arises as a metaphysically coherent description of the inner life of God. I argue that Aquinas himself maintains that the Trinity cannot be known by natural reason alone but only by revelation, yet his metaphysics of God and mind provides a powerful rational framework for showing that the doctrine is not self‑contradictory and is deeply fitting to a rich conception of the God of Christian Scripture. After reconstructing the relevant Aristotelian and Thomistic background, I present a stepwise argument from divine simplicity to the processions of Word and Love, treated as subsistent relations, and respond to major objections regarding representationalism, infinite regress, and the compatibility of internal processions with divine simplicity. I conclude by suggesting how this model can be fruitfully appropriated—and critically qualified—within evangelical systematic theology.

References

1. Aquinas, Thomas. The Summa Theologiæ. 2nd rev. ed. 1920. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Online edition by Kevin Knight, 2017. Accessed March 31, 2026. https://www.newadvent.org/summa/.A-Thomistic-Aristotelian-Model-of-the-Latin-Trinity-as-an-Apologetic-Resource-for-Evangelical-T.docx

2. The Summa Theologiæ. 2nd rev. ed. 1920. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Online edition by Kevin Knight, 2017. I, q. 32, a. 1. Accessed April 11, 2026. https://www.newadvent.org/summa/1032.htm.A-Thomistic-Aristotelian-Model-of-the-Latin-Trinity-as-an-Apologetic-Resource-for-Evangelical-T.docx

3. Anslow, Daniel. “What Roles Do Reason and Revelation Play in the Knowledge of the Trinity According to Thomas Aquinas?” Aristos 6, no. 1 (2020): article 7. Accessed April 11, 2026. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/aristos/vol6/iss1/7/.A-Thomistic-Aristotelian-Model-of-the-Latin-Trinity-as-an-Apologetic-Resource-for-Evangelical-T.docx

4. Anslow, Matthew. “What Roles Do Reason and Revelation Play in the Knowledge of the Trinity, According to St Thomas Aquinas?” Aristos 6, no. 1 (2022): 62–63. Accessed April 11, 2026. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/aristos/vol6/iss1/7/.A-Thomistic-Aristotelian-Model-of-the-Latin-Trinity-as-an-Apologetic-Resource-for-Evangelical-T.docx

5. Basil of Caesarea. Against Eunomius. In The Works of Saint Basil. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012.scispace

6. Boff, Leonardo. Holy Trinity, Perfect Community. Translated by Phillip Berryman. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2000.sharperiron

7. Falconer, Robert. “Discovering the Monarchy of the Father in the Trinity.” The Monarchy of the Father Project, 2024. Accessed May 1, 2026. https://www.robertfalconer.co.za/post/beyond-the-analogies-discovering-the-monarchy-of-the-father-in-the-trinity.robertfalconer

8. Huffling, Brian. “Divine Simplicity at EPS.” Southern Evangelical Seminary, February 25, 2020. Accessed April 11, 2026. https://ses.edu/eps-panel-discussion-on-divine-simplicity/.A-Thomistic-Aristotelian-Model-of-the-Latin-Trinity-as-an-Apologetic-Resource-for-Evangelical-T.docx

9. Jenson, Robert W. Systematic Theology. Vol. 1, The Triune God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.sharperiron

10. Levine, Joseph. “Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64 (1983): 354–361.philarchive

11. Letham, Robert. The Holy Trinity: In Scripture, History, Theology, and Worship. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 2004.sharperiron

12. “On God and Three headed Dogs: Personhood in Social Trinitarianism.” SharperIron, June 14, 2020. Accessed May 1, 2026. https://sharperiron.org/article/god-and-three-headed-dogs-personhood-social-trinitarianism.sharperiron

13. “Two Explanatory Gaps.” PhilArchive. Accessed May 1, 2026. https://philarchive.org/archive/YOOTOE.philarchive

14. “Analytic Philosophy.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed May 1, 2026. https://iep.utm.edu/analytic-philosophy/.iep.utm

15. “Trinity and Simplicity.” The Reformed Classicalist, May 12, 2022. Accessed May 1, 2026. https://www.reformedclassicalist.com/home/trinity-and-simplicity.

Cover Image
Published
2026-07-09
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)