Image of God and Human Dignity in Islam and Christianity: From Discourses of Likeness to the Logic of Divine Unity
- Authors
-
-
Thomas Samuel Petersson
Quest Academy
Author
-
George Nasser
Author
-
- Abstract
-
This article offers a comparative theological analysis of how Islam and Christianity speak about humanity “in the image” of God, and what this implies for divine unity and human dignity. On the Islamic side, it examines the hadith “God created Adam in His image” within the framework of tawḥīd, showing that a strictly unitary concept of God makes it difficult to give a robust account of mankind as a reflection of God without either reducing “image” language to thin metaphor or drifting toward problematic corporealism (mujassimah). On the Christian side, it argues that Trinitarian theology, which confesses God as one in essence and three in persons, can coherently affirm humanity as a genuine reflection of God’s unity-in-Triunity while firmly rejecting any notion that God possesses a physical body. The study traces how Islamic and Christian discourses handle the tension between likeness and transcendence, and contends that Christian Triunity provides a more logically adequate framework for understanding the human person as a reflection of divine unity. Finally, it explores the implications of these differing accounts for human dignity, the critique of corporealist theology, and the theological grounding of the unity of humankind.
- Author Biographies
- References
-
Monographs and edited volumes
1. Abdel Haleem, M. A. S., trans. The Qur’an. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
2. Ayres, Lewis. Nicaea and Its Legacy: An Approach to Fourth-Century Trinitarian Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
3. Ayres, Lewis. Augustine and the Trinity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
4. Cortez, Marc. Theological Anthropology: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: T&T Clark, 2010.
5. Emery, Gilles. The Trinitarian Theology of St Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Francesca Aran Murphy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
6. Frank, Richard M. Beings and Their Attributes: The Teaching of the Basrian School of the Mu‘tazila in the Classical Period. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1978.
7. Holmes, Stephen R. The Quest for the Trinity: The Doctrine of God in Scripture, History and Modernity. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2012.
8. Hoover, Jon. Ibn Taymiyya’s Theodicy of Perpetual Optimism. Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science 73. Leiden: Brill, 2007.
9. Kilner, John F. Dignity and Destiny: Humanity in the Image of God. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015.
10. National Council of Churches. The Holy Bible: New Revised Standard Version. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1989.
11. Rudolph, Ulrich. Al-Māturīdī and the Development of Sunnī Theology in Samarqand. Translated by Rodrigo Adem. Leiden: Brill, 2015.
12. Sachedina, Abdulaziz. Islam and the Challenge of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
13. Winter, Tim, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Classical and scriptural works (editions)
14. Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae. Blackfriars edition. New York: McGraw Hill, 1964–81.
15. Augustine. De Trinitate. Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina 50, 50A. Turnhout: Brepols, 1968.
16. Basil of Caesarea. De Spiritu Sancto. In Sources Chrétiennes 17bis. Paris: Cerf.
17. Gregory of Nazianzus. Orationes theologicae 31 (The Fifth Theological Oration). In Sources Chrétiennes 250. Paris: Cerf.
18. Novum Testamentum Graece. 28th ed. Nestle Aland. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.
Articles and reference entries
19. Holtzman, Livnat. “Anthropomorphism.” In Encyclopaedia of Islam, THREE, edited by Kate Fleet et al. Leiden: Brill (online edition).
20. Kilby, Karen. “Perichoresis and Projection: Problems with Social Doctrines of the Trinity.” New Blackfriars 81, no. 957 (2000): 432–445.
21. Williams, Wesley. “Aspects of the Creed of Imam Aḥmad Ibn Ḩanbal: A Study of Anthropomorphism in Early Islamic Discourse.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 34, no. 3 (2002).
Primary Islamic texts
22. Al Nawawī, Yahyā ibn Sharaf. Al Minhāj bi Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim ibn al Ḥajjāj. commentary on Kitāb al-Birr. Beirut: Dār al Maʿrifa, n.d.
23. Ṣaḥīḥ al Bukhārī. Kitāb al Istiʾdhān, no. 6227. In The Translation of the Meanings of Ṣaḥīḥ al Bukhārī. Translated by Muhammad Muhsin Khan. Riyadh: Darussalam, 1997.
24. Muslim, Imām. Sahih Muslim. Translated by Abdul Hamid Siddiqi. Lahore: Sh. Muhammad Ashraf, n.d.
- Cover Image
-
- Downloads
- Published
- 2026-08-04
- Section
- Articles
- Categories
- License
-
Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s) retain copyright and articles

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Tomas Samuel Petersson, A Thomistic–Aristotelian Model of the Latin Trinity as an Apologetic Resource for Evangelical Theology , Truth in Research: Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Truth in Research: Theology Edition
