Why Evolution Has Failed the Sciences
- Authors
-
-
Bergman J.
Author
-
- Abstract
-
The Neo-Darwinian synthesis asks us to accept that the biological distance separating humanity from an apelike common ancestor was crossed by nothing more than the accumulation and fixation of random genetic mutations, sifted across deep time by natural selection. This paper contends that the molecular evidence points decisively in the opposite direction. Rather than exhibiting the mutational openness that Darwinian change demands, the living cell is equipped with an elaborate, multi-layered apparatus whose measurable and undisputed function is to detect, excise, and reverse the very genetic alterations that evolution requires as its raw material. Over a dozen distinct DNA repair pathways operate continuously in somatic and germ line cells alike, correcting the overwhelming majority of the tens of thousands of lesions each cell sustains daily. The double helical architecture of DNA is itself a repair-ready design, storing two complementary copies of every base so that a damaged strand can be restored from its intact partner. Where a chromosome lacks a homologous partner, as with the male-specific Y chromosome, the genome supplies an ingenious alternative in the form of internal palindromic self-repair. I argue that a system engineered so comprehensively to prevent heritable change cannot plausibly be the engine of unlimited heritable change. The number of coordinated beneficial mutations required to convert an ape-like creature into a human being is so vast, and the waiting times so prohibitive, that molecules-to-man evolution is not merely improbable but effectively impossible. Life, in short, was designed not to evolve.
- Author Biography
- References
-
Behe, M. J. (1996). Darwin's black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. Free Press.
Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium. (2005). Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature, 437(7055), 69–87.
Crow, J. F. (2000). The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation. Nature Reviews Genetics, 1(1), 40–47.
Eyre-Walker, A., & Keightley, P. D. (2007). The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8(8), 610–618.
Friedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C., Siede, W., & Wood, R. D. (2006). DNA repair and mutagenesis (2nd ed.). ASM Press.
Haldane, J. B. S. (1957). The cost of natural selection. Journal of Genetics, 55(3), 511–524.
Kimura, M. (1968). Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature, 217(5129), 624–626.
Kong, A., Frigge, M. L., Masson, G., Besenbacher, S., Sulem, P., Magnusson, G., ... Stefansson, K. (2012). Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father's age to disease risk. Nature, 488(7412), 471–475.
Lindahl, T. (1993). Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature, 362(6422), 709–715.
Lynch, M. (2010). Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(3), 961–968.
ReMine, W. J. (1993). The biotic message: Evolution versus message theory. St. Paul Science.
Rozen, S., Skaletsky, H., Marszalek, J. D., Minx, P. J., Cordum, H. S., Waterston, R. H., ... Page, D. C. (2003). Abundant gene conversion between arms of palindromes in human and ape Y chromosomes. Nature, 423(6942), 873–876.
Sanford, J. C. (2008). Genetic entropy and the mystery of the genome (3rd ed.). FMS Publications.
Sanford, J., Brewer, W., Smith, F., & Baumgardner, J. (2015). The waiting time problem in a model hominin population. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 12, 18.
Tomkins, J. P. (2013). Comprehensive analysis of chimpanzee and human chromosomes reveals average DNA similarity of 70%. Answers Research Journal, 6, 63–69.
- Cover Image
-
- Downloads
- Published
- 2026-07-19
- Section
- Articles
- Categories
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Bergman J., Are Lizards Observed Evolving Live Birth Evidence for Macroevolution? , Truth in Research: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Truth in Research: Foundations of Scientific Inquiry
- Bergman J., D. Budinsky, M. Nailor, Does Simple Clumping Explain the Origin of Multicellularity? , Truth in Research: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Truth in Research: Foundations of Scientific Inquiry
- Bergman J., Is Creationism Religion? , Truth in Research: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Truth in Research: Foundations of Scientific Inquiry
- Bergman J., Regulatory Module Complexity and the Origin of Feathers , Truth in Research: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Truth in Research: Foundations of Scientific Inquiry